Architecture & design
Domain modelling, service boundaries, event-driven and CQRS patterns, and ADRs that record why decisions were made.
Service 04 — Complex Software Development
Distributed systems, high-throughput data pipelines, regulated workloads and legacy modernisation — clean architecture that doesn't need a rewrite at ten times the load.

Why it matters
The expensive failures are architectural: a data model that can't evolve, a system that only scales vertically, a monolith nobody dares deploy. We build for the second and third year of a product, with the discipline — tests, observability, documentation — that makes change cheap.
Stack
What we build
Domain modelling, service boundaries, event-driven and CQRS patterns, and ADRs that record why decisions were made.
Low-latency APIs and services in Go, Rust, Java or TypeScript, with load-tested capacity and graceful degradation.
Kafka-based streaming, batch and real-time pipelines, warehouses and lakehouses, analytics and reporting.
Strangler-fig migration off monoliths and legacy stacks, database decomposition and incremental rewrites with zero downtime.
Production-grade front ends, mobile apps and public APIs with SDKs and documentation.
Automated test pyramids, contract testing, performance and chaos testing, and CI/CD that makes every merge deployable.
Engineering principles
Prove the riskiest path end-to-end before building wide.
Trunk-based development, feature flags, green pipelines.
ADRs for anything a future engineer will ask 'why?' about.
Traces, metrics and logs ship with the code.
Capacity is measured, not assumed.
Novelty only where it buys something real.

Architecture
We start with the business events and invariants, choose boundaries that match team ownership, and pick technology last.

Performance
Throughput and latency targets are agreed up front and verified under load, with graceful degradation designed for the day traffic exceeds them.
How we deliver
Domain workshops, current-system review and non-functional requirements — throughput, latency, compliance, cost.
Target design, technology choices and a thin vertical slice to prove the risky parts early.
Two-week increments with demos, trunk-based development, code review and a definition of done that includes tests and docs.
Load, failure-injection and security testing; observability and runbooks; performance tuning against real traffic patterns.
Handover or ongoing engineering with a roadmap, so the system keeps improving after launch.
Quality bar
Typical targets for a production platform — agreed per engagement.
What we've built
Double-entry ledgers, settlement engines and reconciliation with strict consistency.
Streaming ingestion and routing for fleets and devices at tens of thousands of events per second.
Multi-sided platforms with search, pricing, fulfilment and payouts.
Regulated data platforms with audit trails and fine-grained access.
Lakehouse pipelines with dbt models and self-serve dashboards.
Versioned APIs with SDKs, rate limiting and developer portals.
What clients say
“They rebuilt the core without a single customer noticing. That was the whole point.”
“First team we've worked with who wrote down why, not just what.”
“The load test found the problem the previous vendor shipped.”
FAQ
Yes. We start with a technical audit — architecture, tests, deployment, security — and agree what to stabilise first before adding features.
Fixed-price per milestone with a visible backlog. Changes are estimated and traded against existing scope, so cost and timeline stay explicit.
The one your team can own long-term. We're opinionated about architecture and pragmatic about languages.
Usually. Mixed teams with shared code review and pairing are the norm, and knowledge transfer is part of every milestone.
Let's build
Send us the constraints — throughput, latency, compliance, deadline. We'll come back with an approach and a scoped first slice.