Containerisation & packaging
Dockerfiles that are small, reproducible and secure; Helm charts or Kustomize overlays per environment; image scanning and signing.
Service 03 — Kubernetes Migration
Containerise what you have, split only what should be split, and land it on EKS, AKS or GKE with GitOps delivery, autoscaling, security policy and observability built in.

The platform
What a Synkrith Kubernetes platform includes on day one — so teams ship services instead of fighting YAML.
Golden-path templates, environment previews, self-service docs
GitOps with ArgoCD or Flux, progressive rollouts, automatic rollback
RBAC, workload identity, Kyverno / OPA policies, external secrets, image signing
Prometheus, Grafana, Loki, Tempo, OpenTelemetry, SLO dashboards, paging on symptoms
Ingress, service mesh (Istio / Linkerd), network policies, DNS and certificates automated
EKS / AKS / GKE, node pools, Karpenter autoscaling, upgrades, multi-cluster strategy
What we deliver
Dockerfiles that are small, reproducible and secure; Helm charts or Kustomize overlays per environment; image scanning and signing.
Topology, node pools, autoscaling, networking, ingress and multi-cluster strategy for EKS, AKS or GKE.
ArgoCD or Flux, environment promotion, canaries and automatic rollback.
mTLS, traffic shaping and resilience with Istio or Linkerd; network policies; DNS and certificate automation.
Metrics, logs and traces with SLO dashboards and alerting that pages on symptoms, not noise.
Admission policies, secrets via Vault, runtime detection with Falco, supply-chain controls.
How it runs
Inventory, statefulness, dependencies — and a candid view of what shouldn't move.
1–2 wksClusters, GitOps, observability and policy as code, with a golden-path template.
3–5 wksApps packaged, config externalised, health checks and limits set, images scanned.
per appService-by-service cut-over with traffic shifting, parallel runs and rollback.
per waveRunbooks, on-call handover, cost controls and upgrade cadence.
ongoing
Design
A well-packaged monolith on Kubernetes with good delivery is often the right first step. We decompose services only when there's a scaling or ownership reason.

Run
Upgrades on a schedule, autoscaling that saves money, and alerts that page on user-facing symptoms — so the platform fades into the background.
Golden path
Before / after
| Before | After |
|---|---|
| Deploys via SSH and tickets | Merge to main, watch the rollout |
| Snowflake servers | Immutable images, declarative manifests |
| Secrets in config files | Secrets from Vault via external-secrets |
| Alerts on CPU | Alerts on latency and error budgets |
| Scaling by buying servers | Autoscaling with cost limits |
| One person knows how it works | Documented golden path, shared ownership |
Tooling
Principles
Defaults that are easy to follow and possible to leave.
If it isn't in git, it doesn't exist.
Policies, identity and secrets are wired once, for everyone.
SLOs and error budgets over CPU graphs.
Small, scheduled version bumps instead of painful jumps.
Right-sizing and autoscaling are part of done.
FAQ
No. A well-packaged monolith on Kubernetes with good delivery is often the right first step.
Yes, but deliberately. Managed database services are usually the better home; where Kubernetes is right we use operators and tested backup/restore.
No. The golden path abstracts most of it: a template, a pipeline and a dashboard.
Usually the one on the cloud you already run. We build the same platform on EKS, AKS or GKE.
Right-sized requests, autoscaling, spot capacity where safe, and per-team cost visibility with Kubecost or native tooling.
Let's build
Tell us what you run today. We'll come back within one business day with a platform review and next steps.